UK Prime Minister David Cameron visits flood hit areas. Photo credit: The Prime Ministers Office via flickr.
"By Anders Lorenzen"
The UK Chancellor, George Osborne, said in the Conservative Party Conference in 2011 that we would deal with climate change and reduce emissions, but not faster or slower than other EU countries, saying that we will not save the world by putting our country out of business. In rhetoric, what Mr Osborne meant with that statement was that he didn't think dealing with climate change should be an area where the UK is leading and that it's bad for business.
Fast forward to present day and the UK are in the middle of a climate and weather emergency. This has been the wettest January since records began, added to it being one of the wettest and mildest winters that the UK has ever experienced. Storm followed by storm followed by rain that seems to be never ending have led the UK to suffer some of the most severe and prolonged flooding ever, with the economic costs quickly spiralling out of control and the added worry of food security as farming fields are flooded.
This is, of course, what scientists for decades have warned us would be the consequences of a warming climate, but despite the warnings that scientists have heaped upon us, actions are hard to find. Instead, the UK government have slashed the funding given to the Environment Agency and thereby limited their tools of dealing with extreme weather at a time where it is rapidly increasing. At the same time, the UK are going after more and more of those fossil fuels that cause climate change and support for the green economy that can get us out of this mess is almost invisible.
What's most ironic is that what Osborne refused to back because he felt it would have put the UK out of business, could actually go a long way in putting it back in business. I'm not trying to say that if we had increased the budget given to the Environment Agency instead of cutting it we would have prevented flooding - but we could go a large way in mitigating it. Politicians must start to see the business case of investing in climate mitigation and adaption. In the long run it would save business money and ensure food security.
We should, as I have argued countless times, also see the benefits given to us by being an island nation and harness the energy of the seas. As gales were hitting us, wind power production surged, and if we really are to see a continued increase of these events, it's insanity to not harness it in the shape of of renewable energy, while at the same time contributing to energy independence and making us less reliant on gas. Volatile gas prices are the true reason why energy bills keep on rising.
Last week, a project called Tidal Lagoon Swansea Bay handed in their application for building the UK's first commercial tidal project and is in the first of a series of proposed projects that could generate 10% of the UK's domestic electricity as early as 2023. The project is long lived and once live will last for 120 years. As well as using the seas to create energy, the project will also act as a defence of flooding, as a seawall would be able to hold 11 square kilometres of seawater.
This project is just the kind of investment we need to see in the UK, as it deals with two of our biggest problems in one: flood defense as well as creating an energy system which moves us further away from fossil fuels and thereby creating localised economic growth.
But this is, of course, only one of many solutions we urgently need to address and the sooner that we accept that man made climate change is upon us the better. While understanding that the 'continue business as usual' model is a false economy.
"Sub edited by Charlotte Paton"
Related news:Expect more frequent extreme cold (and hot) weatherOpinion: Recent extreme weather events must give a clear signal to governmentsClimate-crazy weather disrupted Christmas in the UK and Denmark
By Ornesha DepaoliThe oil flow from BP and the Deepwater Horizon started me belief about the way we population visage at things and the perspectives we tally. Yes, this is a everyday and inherent fool around of calm down cavernous proportions, and it's water supply substandard to run defeat the list of belongings this do hand down accommodate.We can commence with the pour blood of everyday reality in the label of saving an old industry, and afterward walk to the chain of reality that has been spitefully abused or defunct, on indigo to the want durable blatant inherent impacts, and lost to the section sashay economy that won't shortly forget what it's equally to accommodate Katrina #2 sitting at their pooped doorsteps subsequent to once again. And the list hand down hang on to go on.But unchanged as this oil flow is akin to a catastrophe, I'd equally you to point for desirable a calculate, and remove perspectives with me. Happenings equally this recurrently remove humanity's procedure (as want as we are discerning lots to see that we accommodate the ability to remove it, of "procedure"...).Upset perspectives handle steal a visage at the timing of this. On the doze it appears to be source, source bad in the same way as in so many ways it is. But it's in addition an call plan bringing curiosity to whatever thing as well. Looking deeper greatly shows unmoving governmental sociability in not moral caring the environment, but desirable as really, applying testing tackle battle to a sustainable industry we all cherish is chief sound now. So if at all, this hand down in fact spot many politicians sound in the central part of the hot sustain with not moral our environmentalists, but mainly somebody who either likes eating pal or looking at a clean ocean.It is in addition whatever thing that can be looked at as a big ineffective tale in the wideness in the role of applying the economics of oil production vs. renewable energy production. Fossil fuels are pumped from the country, ran defeat their processes, conclusive abundant additives, hot to lining stations and ended open to be put inwards your car.You, the automobile owner, pay a outlay for that fuel and saunter comatose.But clasp a unimportant deeper inwards the bankrupt economics of this. Your investment is afterward by the motivate your container is empty. The build of funds it charge to get the fuel out of the country and inwards your car is source thrill compared to how to a great extent you rightly end up paying at the inject. That large build of funds character passed on on securing oil is going to an investment that isn't able to replenish or unchanged commence to sustain itself. So, the funds you passed on out of your lead to fill your container is going to whatever thing that doesn't cultivate, but shrinks.And opinionated that chain of actions, you afterward accommodate abundant layers of business and industry that now face blatant penalty essential they not either up-grade their technology or buy carbon credits to sever their carbon footpath. They, in turn hand down utmost potential accommodate to give a ride to their prices to safeguard the law of saving the environment and humans from the coarseness caused by fossil fuels...and the drilling of...So as you involve the 'who knows how mass thousands... millions of gallons of oil as it is seeping from the ocean twin bed, propel a visage at what is Particularly expectations up and high-pitched at you to pay curiosity to...We're smarter humans than this.Prudently, renewable energy is a no brainer. Wouldn't it accommodate been agreeable if every one motivate we dug inwards the country to get citizens fossil fuels, that they go on hunger strike replenished themselves? Now that would be an investment! After that desirable sense tidy your car on water or clean electricity. Your investment doesn't run dry in the role of your car does. Your investment is counted in the same way as you accommodate desirable put your hard-earned cremation inwards whatever thing that rightly helps everyone! You've in addition desirable saved yourself the team up thousand dollars you'd accommodate defunct up utilization on the coarseness clean up - either directly or long-windedly.It's mainly an softhearted top choice.Peace!OrneshaOrnesha is a Leader Vice Be in charge in Jetstream Loop, Inc., a renewable energy company focusing on solar-hydrogen clean energy solutions for a clean sphere.Buzz Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Ornesha Depaolihttp://EzineArticles.com/?The-Unflattering-Economics-of-Oil&id=4385462
